[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100928232831.GC2419@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:28:31 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@...driver.com>
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] rcu: using ACCESS_ONCE() to observe the
jiffies_stall/rnp->qsmask value
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 04:32:43PM +0800, Dongdong Deng wrote:
> Using ACCESS_ONCE() to observe the jiffies_stall/rnp->qsmask value
> due to the caller didn't hold the root_rcu/rnp node's lock.
Given that the quantities are only used once, ACCESS_ONCE() is strictly
speaking not necessary. I am tempted to queue your patch regardless
for the documentation benefits.
Or is this patch necessary to fix a failure that you have been seeing?
In any case, thank you for taking a look at RCU!
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Dongdong Deng <dongdong.deng@...driver.com>
> CC: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
> CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcutree.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
> index d5bc439..07a7063 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
> @@ -532,9 +532,9 @@ static void check_cpu_stall(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
>
> if (rcu_cpu_stall_panicking)
> return;
> - delta = jiffies - rsp->jiffies_stall;
> + delta = jiffies - ACCESS_ONCE(rsp->jiffies_stall);
> rnp = rdp->mynode;
> - if ((rnp->qsmask & rdp->grpmask) && delta >= 0) {
> + if ((ACCESS_ONCE(rnp->qsmask) & rdp->grpmask) && delta >= 0) {
>
> /* We haven't checked in, so go dump stack. */
> print_cpu_stall(rsp);
> --
> 1.6.0.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists