[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1285747995.7844.42.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:13:15 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Dima Zavin <dima@...roid.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched: normalize sleeper's vruntime during group
change
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 23:46 -0700, Dima Zavin wrote:
> This adds a new callback, prep_move_task, to struct sched_class
> to give sched_fair the opportunity to adjust the task's vruntime
> just before setting its new group.
>
> This allows us to properly normalize a sleeping task's vruntime
> when moving it between different cgroups.
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index db3f674..008fe57 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -3827,10 +3827,23 @@ static void set_curr_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
> static void moved_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
> {
> struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(p);
> + struct sched_entity *se = &p->se;
>
> update_curr(cfs_rq);
> - if (!on_rq)
> + if (!on_rq) {
> + se->vruntime += cfs_rq->min_vruntime;
> place_entity(cfs_rq, &p->se, 1);
> + }
> +}
I'm still missing the place_entity() rationale. Why is a sleeping task
eligible for pain therapy that a runnable task is spared? That state
can change a usec from now.
Nit: place_entity(cfs_rq, se, 1);
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists