[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1285751156.18417.57.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:05:56 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nok.org>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>,
Richard Sharpe <realrichardsharpe@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tcm: Add Thin Provisioning / UNMAP emulation and
Block Limits VPD page
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 14:55 -0400, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "nab" == Nicholas A Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org> writes:
>
> nab> This patch also adds the Block Limits VPD (0xb0) page
>
> You should add the Thin Provisioning VPD page as well and set TPU and/or
> TPWS.
>
Greetings mkp,
So I was looking at adding this VPD page orginally to set TPU=1 w/ DP=0
(because I don't believe there is currently way to get build the
PROVISIONING GROUP DESCRIPTORs from Block Discard knowledge), but I
ended getting a bit confused by the THRESHOLD EXPONENT, and what value
this should returned for the TCM/IBLOCK and TCM/FILEIO backstores when
blk_queue_discard()==1 is enabled.
Since this is currently not implemented in scsi_debug.c or used in any
way by sd.c AFAICT, do you have any additional information on how this
should be determined together with the UNMAP -> blk_issue_discard()
emulation bits..?
Thanks!
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists