| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1285771607-12089-1-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:46:45 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> To: robert.richter@....com Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net, oleg@...hat.com Subject: [PATCHv2 0/2] oprofile, x86: allow backtrace for 32bit apps under 64bit kernel hi, I'm sending reworked version of the support for backtrace of ia32 applications under 64bit kernels. updates are based on comments by Robert Richter v2: - using struct stack_frame for 64bit processes - using struct stack_frame_ia32 for compat processes - added inline function x86_backtrace_32 which is just empty stub for !CONFIG_COMPAT - I did not figure out a smart way to share dump code between 32 and 64 bits. I'm currently under impression the code is so far easy and light enough to live separately and mixing the code would come with more complexity. attached patches: - 1/2 using struct stack_frame for 64bit processes dump - 2/2 adding backtrace dump for 32bit process in compat mode please let me know what you think thanks, jirka --- arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists