linux-kernel - [PATCHv2 2/2] oprofile, x86: adding backtrace dump for 32bit process in compat mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1285771607-12089-3-git-send-email-jolsa@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:46:47 +0200
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	robert.richter@....com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	oleg@...hat.com, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 2/2] oprofile, x86: adding backtrace dump for 32bit process in compat mode

This patch implements the oprofile backtrace  generation for 32 bit
applications running in the 64bit environment (compat mode).

With this change it's possible to get backtrace for 32bits applications
under the 64bits environment using oprofile's callgraph options.

opcontrol --setup -c ...
opreport -l -cg ...

wbr,
jirka


Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
---
 arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c |   53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c b/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c
index d640a86..2d49d4e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/oprofile/backtrace.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
 #include <asm/ptrace.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/stacktrace.h>
+#include <linux/compat.h>
 
 static void backtrace_warning_symbol(void *data, char *msg,
 				     unsigned long symbol)
@@ -48,6 +49,55 @@ static struct stacktrace_ops backtrace_ops = {
 	.walk_stack	= print_context_stack,
 };
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
+static struct stack_frame_ia32 *
+dump_user_backtrace_32(struct stack_frame_ia32 *head)
+{
+	struct stack_frame_ia32 bufhead[2];
+	struct stack_frame_ia32 *fp;
+
+	/* Also check accessibility of one struct frame_head beyond */
+	if (!access_ok(VERIFY_READ, head, sizeof(bufhead)))
+		return NULL;
+	if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(bufhead, head, sizeof(bufhead)))
+		return NULL;
+
+	fp = (struct stack_frame_ia32 *) compat_ptr(bufhead[0].next_frame);
+
+	oprofile_add_trace(bufhead[0].return_address);
+
+	/* frame pointers should strictly progress back up the stack
+	* (towards higher addresses) */
+	if (head >= fp)
+		return NULL;
+
+	return fp;
+}
+
+static inline int
+x86_backtrace_32(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned int depth)
+{
+	struct stack_frame_ia32 *head;
+
+	/* User process is 32-bit */
+	if (!current || !test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32))
+		return 0;
+
+	head = (struct stack_frame_ia32 *) regs->bp;
+	while (depth-- && head)
+		head = dump_user_backtrace_32(head);
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
+#else
+static inline int
+x86_backtrace_32(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned int depth)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_COMPAT */
+
 static struct stack_frame *dump_user_backtrace(struct stack_frame *head)
 {
 	struct stack_frame bufhead[2];
@@ -81,6 +131,9 @@ x86_backtrace(struct pt_regs * const regs, unsigned int depth)
 		return;
 	}
 
+	if (x86_backtrace_32(regs, depth))
+		return;
+
 	while (depth-- && head)
 		head = dump_user_backtrace(head);
 }
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/