linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] oprofile, arm: proper release resources on failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100929165958.GQ13563@erda.amd.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:59:58 +0200
From:	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] oprofile, arm: proper release resources on failure

On 29.09.10 18:50:27, Robert Richter wrote:

> > Hmm, these three hunks conflict with the patches I posted last
> > month to fix the resource allocation and freeing. Can't we
> > merge those patches instead? I have versions against -rc6 here:
> 
> Yes, these patches are also in my oprofile/core branch and its changes
> conflict, but are scheduled for the next merge window. This fix is for
> urgent and for 2.6.36. We will then merge back rc7 or 2.6.36 to
> oprofile/core and solve the conflicts. But if you don't have something
> else for -rc7/.36 that conflicts, this should be ok.

So, it would be ok then to test only this fix on -rc6 without your
other patches.

Thanks,

-Robert

-- 
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/