lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:22:06 -0500
From:	Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>
To:	yinghai@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Problem: scaling of /proc/stat on large systems

I'm looking for suggestions on how to fix a scaling problem with access to
/proc/stat.

On a large x86_64 system (4096p, 256 nodes, 5530 IRQs), access to
/proc/stat takes too long -  more than 12 sec:

	# time cat /proc/stat >/dev/null
	real	12.630s
	user	 0.000s
	sys	12.629s

This affects top, ps (some variants), w, glibc (sysconf) and much more.


One of the items reported in /proc/stat is a total count of interrupts that
have been received. This calculation requires summation of the interrupts
received on each cpu (kstat_irqs_cpu()).

The data is kept in per-cpu arrays linked to each irq_desc. On a
4096p/5530IRQ system summing this data requires accessing ~90MB.


Deleting the summation of the kstat_irqs_cpu data eliminates the high
access time but is an API breakage that I assume is unacceptible.

Another possibility would be using delayed work (similar to vmstat_update)
that periodically sums the data into a single array. The disadvantage in
this approach is that there would be a delay between receipt of an
interrupt & it's count appearing /proc/stat. Is this an issue for anyone?
Another disadvantage is that it adds to the overall "noise" introduced by
kernel threads.

Is there a better approach to take?


--- jack
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ