| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100929231904.GB21930@haskell.muteddisk.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:19:04 -0700 From: matt mooney <mfm@...eddisk.com> To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org> Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/kbuild: correct variable definitions in makefiles.txt On 19:50 Wed 29 Sep , Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:03:29PM +0200, Michal Marek wrote: > > On 20.9.2010 08:33, matt mooney wrote: > > > Change $(src) and $(obj) definitions to state the path as absolute and > > > not relative. > > > > It _is_ a relative patch, AFAICS. What makes you think otherwise? > > With extenal modules $(src) and $(obj) are absolute - but in nomal use they are relative. > And again in normal use they are also equal. I usually say that we have two just to document > what is srource and what is generated. Ah, I see. Sorry, I should have looked into this more. Now you did say in normal use they are equal, but I thought they were also equal when used for an external module too. Am I missing something? Thanks, mfm -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists