[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100930064533.GJ29811@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:45:33 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sound-asoc tree with the i.MX
tree
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:31:11PM -0700, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:23:02AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> > The former removed that code that the latter changed. I just used the
> > former.
>
> > The latter was just changing some names, so ti may be able to be
> > integrated into the former.
>
> Though doing that would break bisection. The other option would be to
> revert the bit of the multi-component change that does the rename which
> I think should be safe - Sacha, Liam, does that seem sensible? There is
> the issue with other potential non-audio users of the SSI to be
> considered.
I might be wrong, but I think there are no non-audio users of the ssi
device?
I think the correct fix is to squash the patch I just sent into the
commit merging the two.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists