[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100930012641.GA2604@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:26:41 -0400
From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-cris-kernel@...s.com,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, starvik@...s.com,
jesper.nilsson@...s.com
Subject: Re: [RFC trollpatch 1/1] genirq: Remove the fits all and nothing
__do_IRQ() code
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 06:14:14PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> __do_IRQ() has been deprecated after a two years migration phase in
> commit 0e57aa1. Since then another 18 month have gone by.
>
> The following architectures are still using __do_IRQ():
>
> alpha, cris, ia64, h8300, m32r, m68knommu, parisc, um
>
> So now the question arises what to do with __do_IRQ().
>
In penance while I finish testing what I can on parisc this week
(conversion is done, I just need to find time to plug in ancient crap
and see if it still handles interrupts...) I've killed __do_IRQ on
cris. Sort of. I have no idea if it builds or anything, but it was
pretty low-hanging fruit since it does all its own masking in its
entry point, so as near as I can tell, aside from disabling spurious
irqs, none of the irq_chip handlers aside from affinity are needed
on cris.
(Since it's masking/unmasking itself, it looks like handle_simple_irq
will work for the common irqs, and on v32 we can use handle_percpu_irq
for the timer and ipi.)
Visual compilation at least gives me a logical flow that seems generally
sensible.
I'd appreciate a second pair of eyes, and if it's ok, I'll clean it up
and submit it.
regards, Kyle
---
arch-v10/kernel/irq.c | 26 +++++---------------------
arch-v32/kernel/irq.c | 49 ++++++++++++-------------------------------------
kernel/irq.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v10/kernel/irq.c b/arch/cris/arch-v10/kernel/irq.c
index a0c0df8..07f17ce 100644
--- a/arch/cris/arch-v10/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/cris/arch-v10/kernel/irq.c
@@ -104,16 +104,6 @@ static void (*interrupt[NR_IRQS])(void) = {
IRQ31_interrupt
};
-static void enable_crisv10_irq(unsigned int irq);
-
-static unsigned int startup_crisv10_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- enable_crisv10_irq(irq);
- return 0;
-}
-
-#define shutdown_crisv10_irq disable_crisv10_irq
-
static void enable_crisv10_irq(unsigned int irq)
{
crisv10_unmask_irq(irq);
@@ -124,22 +114,16 @@ static void disable_crisv10_irq(unsigned int irq)
crisv10_mask_irq(irq);
}
-static void ack_crisv10_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-}
-
-static void end_crisv10_irq(unsigned int irq)
+static void crisv10_noop(unsigned int irq)
{
}
static struct irq_chip crisv10_irq_type = {
.name = "CRISv10",
- .startup = startup_crisv10_irq,
- .shutdown = shutdown_crisv10_irq,
- .enable = enable_crisv10_irq,
+ .unmask = enable_crisv10_irq,
+ .mask = disable_crisv10_irq,
.disable = disable_crisv10_irq,
- .ack = ack_crisv10_irq,
- .end = end_crisv10_irq,
+ .ack = crisv10_noop,
.set_affinity = NULL
};
@@ -221,7 +205,7 @@ init_IRQ(void)
/* Initialize IRQ handler descriptors. */
for(i = 2; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
- irq_desc[i].chip = &crisv10_irq_type;
+ set_irq_chip_and_handler(i, &crisv10_irq_type, handle_simple_irq);
set_int_vector(i, interrupt[i]);
}
diff --git a/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/irq.c b/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/irq.c
index 2ed48ae..2efc98c 100644
--- a/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/cris/arch-v32/kernel/irq.c
@@ -290,36 +290,6 @@ void crisv32_unmask_irq(int irq)
unblock_irq(irq, irq_cpu(irq));
}
-
-static unsigned int startup_crisv32_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- crisv32_unmask_irq(irq);
- return 0;
-}
-
-static void shutdown_crisv32_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- crisv32_mask_irq(irq);
-}
-
-static void enable_crisv32_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- crisv32_unmask_irq(irq);
-}
-
-static void disable_crisv32_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
- crisv32_mask_irq(irq);
-}
-
-static void ack_crisv32_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-}
-
-static void end_crisv32_irq(unsigned int irq)
-{
-}
-
int set_affinity_crisv32_irq(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *dest)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -330,14 +300,16 @@ int set_affinity_crisv32_irq(unsigned int irq, const struct cpumask *dest)
return 0;
}
+static void crisv32_noop(unsigned int irq)
+{
+}
+
static struct irq_chip crisv32_irq_type = {
.name = "CRISv32",
- .startup = startup_crisv32_irq,
- .shutdown = shutdown_crisv32_irq,
- .enable = enable_crisv32_irq,
- .disable = disable_crisv32_irq,
- .ack = ack_crisv32_irq,
- .end = end_crisv32_irq,
+ .mask = crisv32_mask_irq,
+ .disable = crisv32_mask_irq,
+ .unmask = crisv32_unmask_irq,
+ .ack = crisv32_noop,
.set_affinity = set_affinity_crisv32_irq
};
@@ -472,15 +444,18 @@ init_IRQ(void)
/* Point all IRQ's to bad handlers. */
for (i = FIRST_IRQ, j = 0; j < NR_IRQS; i++, j++) {
- irq_desc[j].chip = &crisv32_irq_type;
+ set_irq_chip_and_handler(j, &crisv32_irq_type,
+ handle_simple_irq);
set_exception_vector(i, interrupt[j]);
}
/* Mark Timer and IPI IRQs as CPU local */
irq_allocations[TIMER0_INTR_VECT - FIRST_IRQ].cpu = CPU_FIXED;
irq_desc[TIMER0_INTR_VECT].status |= IRQ_PER_CPU;
+ set_irq_handler(TIMER0_INTR_VECT, handle_percpu_irq);
irq_allocations[IPI_INTR_VECT - FIRST_IRQ].cpu = CPU_FIXED;
irq_desc[IPI_INTR_VECT].status |= IRQ_PER_CPU;
+ set_irq_handler(IPI_INTR_VECT, handle_percpu_irq);
set_exception_vector(0x00, nmi_interrupt);
set_exception_vector(0x30, multiple_interrupt);
diff --git a/arch/cris/kernel/irq.c b/arch/cris/kernel/irq.c
index 469f7f9..14d9ce9 100644
--- a/arch/cris/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/cris/kernel/irq.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ asmlinkage void do_IRQ(int irq, struct pt_regs * regs)
printk("do_IRQ: stack overflow: %lX\n", sp);
show_stack(NULL, (unsigned long *)sp);
}
- __do_IRQ(irq);
+ generic_handle_irq(irq);
irq_exit();
set_irq_regs(old_regs);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists