linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf: Declare hw_perf_{dis,en}able() in perf

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1285845732.2144.13.camel@laptop>
Date:	Thu, 30 Sep 2010 13:22:12 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
Cc:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf: Declare hw_perf_{dis,en}able() in
 perf_event.h

On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 19:39 +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Since they can be defined in arch-specific code declare them in
> perf_event.h and remove following warnings from sparse:
> 
>  kernel/perf_event.c:83:13: warning: symbol 'hw_perf_disable' was not declared. Should it be static?
>  kernel/perf_event.c:84:13: warning: symbol 'hw_perf_enable' was not declared. Should it be static?
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>

What tree is this against, those function no longer exist!?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/