[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100930115645.GA6037@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:56:45 +0400
From: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>
To: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mattst88@...il.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] alpha: switch osf_sigprocmask() to use of
sigprocmask()
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 08:39:01PM +1300, Michael Cree wrote:
> It appears to be worse than that. It introduces a regression. On boot up
> on a Compaq Alpha XP1000 the system appears to freeze at the point of
> mounting swap. It eventually resumes after almost three minutes and
> continues to boot. A bisection returned this very commit as the first bad
> commit. With a kernel without this commit the (truncated) bootup log is:
Confirmed, I see some processes get stuck, apparently waiting for signals.
Looks like yet another typo - _BLOCKABLE is defined as
(~(sigmask(SIGKILL) | sigmask(SIGSTOP))), so (newmask & ~_BLOCKABLE)
clears everything but SIGKILL and SIGSTOP.
Ivan.
diff --git a/arch/alpha/kernel/signal.c b/arch/alpha/kernel/signal.c
index d290845..6f7feb5 100644
--- a/arch/alpha/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/alpha/kernel/signal.c
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(osf_sigprocmask, int, how, unsigned long, newmask)
sigset_t mask;
unsigned long res;
- siginitset(&mask, newmask & ~_BLOCKABLE);
+ siginitset(&mask, newmask & _BLOCKABLE);
res = sigprocmask(how, &mask, &oldmask);
if (!res) {
force_successful_syscall_return();
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists