[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CA484BA.7090809@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:38:18 +0200
From: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
CC: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] procfs: fix numbering in /proc/locks
The lock number in /proc/locks (first field) is implemented by a counter
(private field of struct seq_file) which is incremented at each call of
locks_show() and reset to 1 in locks_start() whatever the offset is. It
should be reset according to the actual position in the list.
Moreover, locks_show() can be called twice to print a single line thus
skipping a number. The counter should be incremented in locks_next().
Signed-off-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
---
locks.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index ab24d49..49d7343 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -2166,19 +2166,19 @@ static int locks_show(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
list_for_each_entry(bfl, &fl->fl_block, fl_block)
lock_get_status(f, bfl, (long)f->private, " ->");
- f->private++;
return 0;
}
static void *locks_start(struct seq_file *f, loff_t *pos)
{
lock_kernel();
- f->private = (void *)1;
+ f->private = (void *) (*pos + 1);
return seq_list_start(&file_lock_list, *pos);
}
static void *locks_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
{
+ f->private++;
return seq_list_next(v, &file_lock_list, pos);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists