[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100930214418.GB490@shell>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:44:18 -0400
From: Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>, Ram Pai <linuxram@...ibm.com>
Cc: viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, hch@...radead.org, agruen@...e.de,
npiggin@...nel.dk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/34] VFS: Make clone_mnt() and copy_tree() return error codes
(Resend with correct email for Ram Pai)
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:51:30AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Sep 2010, Valerie Aurora wrote:
> > copy_tree() can theoretically fail in a case other than ENOMEM, but
> > always returns NULL which is interpreted by callers as -ENOMEM.
> > Convert to return an explicit error. Convert clone_mnt() for
> > consistency and because union mounts will add new error cases.
>
> I think it makes sense to push this fix to 2.6.37 independently of the
> other patches.
>
> Acked-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>
I'm certainly not going to argue, but I spent an hour trying to
trigger the non-ENOMEM case (below) and failed - maybe it's
unreachable?
> > @@ -1212,11 +1216,12 @@ struct vfsmount *copy_tree(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry,
> > struct path path;
> >
> > if (!(flag & CL_COPY_ALL) && IS_MNT_UNBINDABLE(mnt))
> > - return NULL;
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
Ram, do you remember how this worked?
-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists