[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100930143147.82143840.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:31:47 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp" <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/4] memcg: use ID instead of pointer in
page_cgroup , retry v2.
On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:48:21 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 18:13:02 +0900
> KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > This is a reviced series of use ID.
> > Restart from RFC.
> >
>
> Then, I changed my mind..This is a new set. No new special lookups.
> But you may feel somethig strange. I don't want to merge these patches
> at once. Just think this set as a dump of my stack. Any comments are welcome.
>
At LinuxCon Japan, I talked with Nishimura and just sending only patch 1/4
will be best (go step-by-step). And I know Greg Thelen now rewrite his
dirty page accounting for memcg patch onto the latest mmotm. I think current
priority of it is higher than this. So, I'll wait for a while and post only
patch 1/4.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists