| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100930061348.GY5665@dastard> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:13:48 +1000 From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/17] fs: icache lock inode hash On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:52:20PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:18:35 +1000 Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote: > > > DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_lock); > > DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sb_inode_list_lock); > > +DEFINE_SPINLOCK(inode_hash_lock); > > I assume these all go away later on. If not, they'll probably all land > in the same cacheline! indeed, the hash lock goes away in this series, as does the inode_lock. I'll check the other new locks don't land in the same cacheline. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@...morbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists