| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4CA5CF17.1090807@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:07:51 -0400 From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com> To: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com> CC: linux-mm@...ck.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Ying Han <yinghan@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Reduce mmap_sem hold times during file backed page faults On 10/01/2010 01:04 AM, Michel Lespinasse wrote: > Linus, I would appreciate your comments on this since you shot down the > previous proposal. I hope you'll find this approach is sane, but I would > be interested to hear if you have specific objections. > > mmap_sem is very coarse grained (per process) and has long read-hold times > (disk latencies); this breaks down rapidly for workloads that use both > read and write mmap_sem acquires. This short patch series tries to reduce > mmap_sem hold times when faulting in file backed VMAs. The changes make sense to me, but it would be good to know what kind of benefits you have seen with these patches. Especially performance numbers :) -- All rights reversed -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists