[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101001132151.GC13563@erda.amd.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:21:52 +0200
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: "linux-next@...r.kernel.org" <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the oprofile tree with the tip tree
On 30.09.10 23:53:01, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the oprofile tree got a conflict in
> arch/arm/oprofile/common.c between commit
> 98d943b02f6f1b57787ff1aa6f34d019a407e3ee ("oprofile, ARM: Release
> resources on failure") from the tip tree and commit
> c7fd239a647ead1c336a051012d6bb96465ea8c6 ("ARM: oprofile: fix and
> simplify init/exit functions") from the oprofile tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Stephen,
thanks for catching this. I have updated the oprofile/for-next tree
and now it should merge without conflicts with tip.
Will,
you may pull the merge from oprofile/core too.
Thanks again,
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists