linux-kernel - Re: [patch] xfs: properly account for reclaimed inodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101001140237.GC4681@dastard>
Date:	Sat, 2 Oct 2010 00:02:37 +1000
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	xfs@....sgi.com, John Hawley <warthog9@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] xfs: properly account for reclaimed inodes

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:43:54AM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> When marking an inode reclaimable, a per-AG counter is increased, the
> inode is tagged reclaimable in its per-AG tree, and, when this is the
> first reclaimable inode in the AG, the AG entry in the per-mount tree
> is also tagged.
> 
> When an inode is finally reclaimed, however, it is only deleted from
> the per-AG tree.  Neither the counter is decreased, nor is the parent
> tree's AG entry untagged properly.
> 
> Since the tags in the per-mount tree are not cleared, the inode
> shrinker iterates over all AGs that have had reclaimable inodes at one
> point in time.
> 
> The counters on the other hand signal an increasing amount of slab
> objects to reclaim.  Since "70e60ce xfs: convert inode shrinker to
> per-filesystem context" this is not a real issue anymore because the
> shrinker bails out after one iteration.
> 
> But the problem was observable on a machine running v2.6.34, where the
> reclaimable work increased and each process going into direct reclaim
> eventually got stuck on the xfs inode shrinking path, trying to scan
> several million objects.
> 
> Fix this by properly unwinding the reclaimable-state tracking of an
> inode when it is reclaimed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> Cc: stable@...nel.org

Looks OK to me, and has run through a few hours of testing without
problems.

Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/