linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/9] v3 Add mutex for adding/removing memory blocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101001184538.GI14064@sgi.com>
Date:	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:45:38 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Robin Holt <holt@....com>, steiner@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] v3 Add mutex for adding/removing memory blocks

On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 01:29:42PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> Add a new mutex for use in adding and removing of memory blocks.  This
> is needed to avoid any race conditions in which the same memory block could
> be added and removed at the same time.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Robin Holt <holt@....com>

I am fine with this patch by itself, but its only real function is
to protect the count introduced by the next patch.  You might want to
combine the patches, but if not, that is fine as well.

Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/