linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/4] iovmm: fix roundup for next area and end check for the last area

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:21:36 -0500
From:	"Guzman Lugo, Fernando" <fernando.lugo@...com>
To:	David Cohen <david.cohen@...ia.com>
CC:	"Doyu Hiroshi (Nokia-MS/Espoo)" <hiroshi.doyu@...ia.com>,
	"Contreras Felipe (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)" <felipe.contreras@...ia.com>,
	"Palande Ameya (Nokia-MS/Helsinki)" <ameya.palande@...ia.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"andy.shevchenko@...il.com" <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/4] iovmm: fix roundup for next area and end check for
 the last area

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Cohen [mailto:david.cohen@...ia.com] 
> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 12:53 PM
> To: Guzman Lugo, Fernando
> Cc: Doyu Hiroshi (Nokia-MS/Espoo); Contreras Felipe 
> (Nokia-MS/Helsinki); Palande Ameya (Nokia-MS/Helsinki); 
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; andy.shevchenko@...il.com; 
> linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] iovmm: fix roundup for next area and 
> end check for the last area
> 
> On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 06:10:30PM +0200, ext Guzman Lugo, 
> Fernando wrote:
> >  
> 
> [snip]
> 
> > > >  arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c |    6 +++---
> > > >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> > > b/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> > > > index 24ca9c4..fc6b109 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/iovmm.c
> > > > @@ -289,19 +289,19 @@ static struct iovm_struct
> > > *alloc_iovm_area(struct iommu *obj, u32 da,
> > > >  	prev_end = 0;
> > > >  	list_for_each_entry(tmp, &obj->mmap, list) {
> > > >  
> > > > -		if (prev_end >= start)
> > > > +		if (prev_end > start)
> > > >  			break;
> > > >  
> > > >  		if (start + bytes <= tmp->da_start)
> > > >  			goto found;
> > > >  
> > > >  		if (flags & IOVMF_DA_ANON)
> > > > -			start = roundup(tmp->da_end + 
> 1, alignement);
> > > > +			start = roundup(tmp->da_end, 
> alignement);
> > > 
> > > There's a lack of comment here, but the purpose of
> > > tmp->da_end + 1 is to create a gap between iovm areas to
> > > force to trigger iommu faults when some access exceeds a 
> valid area. 
> > > Without this gap, such situation may produce data 
> corruption which 
> > > is much more difficult to track.
> > 
> > That only works when you are accessing sequencially beyond 
> the End of 
> > the vm_area. However if you are accessing a random address 
> Which is in 
> > the mmu tables you still can corrupt memory which does Not 
> belong to 
> > you. That looks not very effective then why waste Memory?
> 
> The main intention is to detect sequential access beyond the 
> end of the vm area and it is effective for that purpose.
> i.e., OMAP3 ISP has a hw issue which makes its H3A submodule, 
> responsible to produce statistics data for the captured 
> image, to write more data than it should. The workaround 
> described in the errata wasn't enough to avoid error 
> conditions, so a different approach was implemented. This gap 
> did help me to make sure the new workaround is valid and no 
> data corruption was occurring anymore.
> Anyway, I can't see why memory is being wasted.
> 

I was taking about vitual memory waste (maybe not so important).
Is ok for me then keep the gap. Do other changes look good to
You?

Thnaks for the comments,
Fernando.

> > 
> > Maybe other mechanism should be implemente like in the process 
> > Switching when if the process has DMM virtual memory area and if So 
> > enablig only that area (all other process areas will be 
> Dissabled and 
> > it would get a mmufault in case of access). However That 
> increase the 
> > time of switching between process.
> 
> Sure. We can have other mechanisms. But in the above 
> scenario, H3A submodule has sequential access and can corrupt 
> its own data. It has more than one buffer and they're likely 
> to be mapped to sequential memory areas without the mechanism 
> you're about to remove.
> 
> If you're able to implement a better mechanism, please remove 
> this one just when a new is already there. :)
> 
> Regards,
> 
> David
> 
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Fernando.
> > 
> > > 
> > > Br,
> > > 
> > > David
> > > 
> > > >  
> > > >  		prev_end = tmp->da_end;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	if ((start > prev_end) && (ULONG_MAX - start >= bytes))
> > > > +	if ((start >= prev_end) && (ULONG_MAX - start + 
> 1 >= bytes))
> > > >  		goto found;
> > > >  
> > > >  	dev_dbg(obj->dev, "%s: no space to fit %08x(%x) 
> flags: %08x\n",
> > > > --
> > > > 1.6.3.3
> > > > 
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe 
> > > > linux-kernel" in the body of a message to 
> > > > majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at  
> > > > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > > Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> > > 
> --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/