| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20101001210037.GB11505@kroah.com> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:00:37 -0700 From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> Cc: stable <stable@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix 2.6.32.23 suspend regression caused by commit 6f6198a On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:44:11PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 12:16 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 07:04:11AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > Again, with a less bouncy address. > > > > > > From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> > > > Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 05:57:59 +0200 > > > Subject: [PATCH] fix 2.6.32.23 suspend regression caused by commit > > > 6f6198a > > > > > > 6f6198a sched: kill migration thread in CPU_POST_DEAD instead of > > > CPU_DEAD > > > leaves migration threads lying about. Mask out CPU_TASKS_FROZEN. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de> > > > > Is this patch upstream already? If so, what's the git commit id of it? > > If not, why isn't it also needed there? > > No, it's not upstream, and will never go upstream because they don't > need it. It's only needed for -stable because the fix incorporated in > -stable is incomplete. Upstream already does what this patch adds. Ah, ok, that makes sense, thanks. I'll queue it up. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists