[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101002165433.GL21129@thunk.org>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 12:54:33 -0400
From: Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>,
Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
Subject: Re: [Bug #19062] Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 10:04:15PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> know (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19062
> Subject : Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi btrfs
> Submitter : Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@...arb.net>
> Date : 2010-09-23 0:54 (4 days old)
> Message-ID : <4C9AA546.6050201@...arb.net>
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128520328929595&w=2
Note: I'm seeing this warning (Dirtiable inode bdi default != sb bdi)
when I moved from 2.6.36-rc3 to 2.6.36-rc6, using ext4 as a root
partition, and running mke2fs and e2fsck on ext2, ext3, and ext4 file
systems. So I'm seeing this as a known regression from rc3 to rc6.
Maybe it's different bug with ext4, but in any case, it's highly
annoying.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists