[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1285995551.1696.19.camel@leonhard>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:59:11 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>
To: "Daniel K." <dk@...no>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v3 09/24] ptrace: cleanup arch_ptrace() on frv
2010-10-02 (토), 12:57 +0900, Namhyung Kim:
> 2010-10-02 (토), 03:18 +0000, Daniel K.:
> > Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > case PTRACE_POKEUSR: /* write the word at location addr in the USER area */
> > > ret = -EIO;
> > - if ((addr & 3) || addr < 0)
> > + if (addr & 3)
> > break;
> >
> > > - ret = 0;
> > > - switch (addr >> 2) {
> > > + switch (regno) {
> > > case 0 ... PT__END - 1:
> > > - ret = put_reg(child, addr >> 2, data);
> > > - break;
> > > -
> > > - default:
> > > - ret = -EIO;
> > > + ret = put_reg(child, regno, data);
> > > break;
> > > }
> > > break;
> >
> > With this, you remove the default case, and no longer return -EIO in the
> > cases of PT__END + n, as in the PTRACE_PEEKUSR section above.
> >
> > This is a change of behaviour as far as I can tell, and not just a cleanup.
> >
> >
> > Daniel K.
>
> My bad. It should be my mistake. Will resend the fix soon.
> Thanks.
>
>
My mistake, again. I was bit confused.
It would not be a change of behaviour. Because 'ret' was initialized
with -EIO and only changed in the switch case. So assignment before
switch can be removed and then will return -EIO in default case.
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Namhyung Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists