[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1286017262.2144.90.camel@laptop>
Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:01:02 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
Cc: miltonm@....com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 1/2] IRQ: use cpu_possible_mask rather than
online_mask in setup_affinity
On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 14:26 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> The use of online_mask requires architecture code to be hotplug-aware to
> account for IRQ round-robin'ing.
Architectures that support hotplug should be hotplug aware, that's not
too much to ask imho.
> With user-driven dynamic SMT,
What's that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists