[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1286027958-7333-3-git-send-email-julia@diku.dk>
Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:59:17 +0200
From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
To: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: Add missing error handling code
Extend the error handling code with operations found in other nearby error
handling code
A simplified version of the sematic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@r exists@
@r@
statement S1,S2,S3;
constant C1,C2,C3;
@@
*if (...)
{... S1 return -C1;}
...
*if (...)
{... when != S1
return -C2;}
...
*if (...)
{... S1 return -C3;}
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
---
This is only a suggestion. All of the other ways out of this function call
these two functions. But I don't understand the code well enough to know
why, or whether there is a reason not to do it in this case.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index bced9b2..cfe5978 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3258,6 +3258,8 @@ i915_gem_object_pin_and_relocate(struct drm_gem_object *obj,
(int) reloc->offset,
reloc->read_domains,
reloc->write_domain);
+ drm_gem_object_unreference(target_obj);
+ i915_gem_object_unpin(obj);
return -EINVAL;
}
if (reloc->write_domain & I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU ||
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists