[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101003182701.GI7896@balbir.in.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 23:57:01 +0530
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
steiner@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/9] v3 Define memory_block_size_bytes for powerpc/pseries
* Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> [2010-10-03 11:11:01]:
> On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 13:07 -0500, Robin Holt wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 11:25:00PM +0530, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > > * Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com> [2010-10-01 13:35:54]:
> > >
> > > > Define a version of memory_block_size_bytes() for powerpc/pseries such that
> > > > a memory block spans an entire lmb.
> > >
> > > I hope I am not missing anything obvious, but why not just call it
> > > lmb_size, why do we need memblock_size?
> > >
> > > Is lmb_size == memblock_size after your changes true for all
> > > platforms?
> >
> > What is an lmb? I don't recall anything like lmb being referred to in
> > the rest of the kernel.
>
> Heh. It's the OpenFirmware name for a Logical Memory Block. Basically
> what we use to determine the SECTION_SIZE on powerpc. Probably not the
> best terminology to use elsewhere in the kernel.
Agreed for the kernel, this patch was for powerpc/pseries, hence was
checking in this context.
--
Three Cheers,
Balbir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists