[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1286146653.2463.310.camel@pasglop>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 09:57:33 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/47] Sparse irq rework
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 21:16 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> And I really do not see a point to have a truly random 64bit number
> space for interrupts. Especially the dynamically allocated interrupts
> (MSI & co) do not care about the number space at all. They care about
> getting a unique number, nothing else.
Actually, some implementations care about the actual number... but then,
at least on powerpc, those are hidden behind the virq translation so we
really don't care :-)
(IE. Some PCI host bridges give meaning to the bits of the number, while
x86 tends to use the address for that).
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists