[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CA83651.1010502@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2010 09:52:49 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, Nathan Fontenot <nfont@...tin.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] v2 De-Couple sysfs memory directories from memory
sections
On 09/29/2010 02:37 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >> > Thankfully things like rpm, hald, and other miscellaneous commands scan
> >> > that information.
> >>
> >> Really? Why? Why would rpm care about this? hald is dead now so we
> >> don't need to worry about that anymore,
> >
> > That's not what compatiblity means. We can't just support
> > latest-and-greatest userspace on latest-and-greatest kernels.
>
> Oh, I know that, that's not what I was getting at at all here, sorry if
> it came across that way.
>
> I wanted to know so we could go fix programs that are mucking around in
> these files, as odds are, the shouldn't be doing that in the first
> place.
>
> Like rpm, why would it matter what the memory in the system looks like?
>
I see, thanks.
--
I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this
signature is too narrow to contain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists