[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101003112920.GB32736@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 3 Oct 2010 12:29:20 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/47] Sparse irq rework
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 05:23:12AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 11:14:27PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The following patch series cleans up and mostly reimplements the core
> > sparse irq implementation and sanitizes the most complex (ab)user:
> > arch/x86
>
> Hoy Thomas,
>
> patches 1-13 & 15 all look fine to me. Feel free to add my Acked-by:
> line.
>
> Patch 14 seems to be missing, and by inference it appears that the
> all important new allocator is added by patch 14. All of the rest of
> the series seems to be fine, but I'm forced to make assumptions about
> what the new allocator looks like, so I cannot be positive.
Patch 14 was present, you were even CC'd on it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists