linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Add a trace event for works enqueuing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Oct 2010 17:54:44 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Add a trace event for works enqueuing

On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 04:46:56PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Sorry about the delay.  I was off last week.
> 
> How about something like this?  It probably needs to be split into two
> patches.  It provides more information on which CPU was requested and
> eventually chosen and separates queueing and activation which can be
> useful for analyzing latency or freezer issues.
> 
> Thanks.



Yep looks good. I hadn't thought about frozen works.

Thanks.

(I think this should go through your tree rather than the tracing tree).

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/