[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101004175039.GC2900@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2010 13:50:39 -0400
From: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
ralf@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jump label: Add MIPS support.
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 10:43:07AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 10/03/2010 11:15 AM, Rabin Vincent wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:40 PM, David Daney<ddaney@...iumnetworks.com> wrote:
>>> +void arch_jump_label_text_poke_early(jump_label_t addr)
>>> +{
>>> + union mips_instruction *insn_p =
>>> + (union mips_instruction *)(unsigned long)addr;
>>> +
>>> + insn_p->word = 0; /* nop */
>>> + flush_icache_range((unsigned long)insn_p,
>>> + (unsigned long)insn_p + sizeof(*insn_p));
>>> +}
>>
>> Can't this function be a no-op on MIPS? This seems to be
>> used on x86 to patch in the optimal nop instruction, but
>> on MIPS the optimal/only nop instruction should already
>> be in place at build time. Same thing for the SPARC
>> implementation.
>>
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> On MIPS the NOP is already optimal. I will respin the MIPS patch to
> make arch_jump_label_text_poke_early() be empty.
>
> davem wasn't CCed on the original message, so I added him. I would
> defer to him on the SPARC version.
>
>
that's right, arch_jump_label_text_poke_early() can probably be a no-op
for most arches.
We can also look at adding an empty definition into the generic
header. So that arches don't have to provide an empty definition.
thanks,
-Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists