linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: Fix Kconfig dependencies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CAA4E9E.8040002@suse.cz>
Date:	Tue, 05 Oct 2010 00:01:02 +0200
From:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
To:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
Cc:	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Fix Kconfig dependencies

On 4.10.2010 18:03, Jean Delvare wrote:
> You have bad luck, I'm afraid. Sure, most users do not unset
> I2C_HELPER_AUTO, so they will not see the extra entries in the main I2C
> menu, however _I_ unset it and guess what, _I_ am the one deciding
> whether your patch can be applied or not ;)

OK :).


>> Please consider for 2.6.36, as the warning is caused by a kconfig fix
>> that I'm about to send to Linus for 2.6.36. And it is triggered by a
>> simple 'make defconfig' in i386/x84_64:
> 
> You should reconsider then. Kernel 2.6.36 will be released in a few
> days, is your fix so important that it has to go in, even when you have
> evidence that it breaks other parts of the configuration, which in turn
> will have to be fixed?

To clarify: The kconfig fix does not "break" anything. It just correctly
warns in cases where it previously did not spot a broken dependency. My
patch was just a means to silence a warning, nothing more.

Michal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/