[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CAA55F9.90503@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 15:32:25 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Nick Lowe <nick.lowe@...il.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>,
Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>,
Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...e.hu, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: Dynamic nop selection breaks boot on Geode LX
On 10/04/2010 03:25 PM, Nick Lowe wrote:
> > As far as I'm aware, the check is just broken in VMs that trace their
> > lineage to Connectix's VirtualPC that Microsoft acquired back in 2006.
> > Is this correct? On balance, is this really to be cared about?
If it was a huge win from using NOPL, then it would perhaps not be -- or
we'd go through more effort at detecting the broken cases. However,
since it's not, it's easier to just avoid it.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists