[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1P2hgC-0001oA-Gw@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2010 11:49:56 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vaurora@...hat.com, neilb@...e.de,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, apw@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] overlayfs: module and statfs fixes
On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
> Just been playing with overlayfs and hit a couple of issues. First I
> was not able to build this filesystem as a module. Second statfs support
> was missing. Following this email are a couple of patches which I used to
> fix these up. I am not 100% sure the statfs approach is quite right, but
> its not clear the semantics can ever be correct in the face of an overlay.
Applied both patches and pused to the overlayfs.v3 branch. Also
pushed a patch changing two BUG_ONs to WARN_ON.
>
> With these applied I was able to drop an overlay over the top of a very
> out of date Ubuntu chroot and upgrade it to the latest and greatest;
> all without incident.
Great, thanks for testing.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists