linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.35.6 XFS: Inconsistent lock state

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20101005002531.GK4681@dastard>
Date:	Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:25:31 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Simon Kirby <sim@...tway.ca>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: 2.6.35.6 XFS: Inconsistent lock state

On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 03:48:30PM -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
> Out of the blue, while running postfix+mailscanner:
> 

False positive - reclaim will never be attempting to lock an active
inode. IIRC The page cache allocation in .36 now uses GFP_NOFS, so
this should go away when you update to a newer kernel.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/