[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CAAEB67.6090005@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 11:09:59 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>, heukelum@...tmail.fm,
tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gas 2.16 and assembly macros -- entry_64.S build failure
On 10/05/2010 09:51 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > I suppose it isn't possible to refuse to build with the broken version?
>
> We could leave it build-broken and ask for a version specific quirk that
> runs a simple sed script over the source to turns 'pushl_cfi' et al into
> 'push', or so?
>
Good idea.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists