[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101005161826.GE19730@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:18:26 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Cc: Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>,
linux-input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [PATCH] Input: add appleir USB driver
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 06:07:36PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. Oktober 2010, 17:55:52 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> > > Yes, but based on sane timing. From the time stamps user space
> > > would conclude that the key had been pressed at an unknown time
> > > before open and released at the time the event indicates. Possibly
> > > it would compute that the key had been held for at least hours.
> > >
> >
> > I do not understand. If a client never seen the "press" event and only
> > saw "release" event it can't make any assumptions about timing. Press
> > could be a millisecond ago or an hour ago, it just does not know. And
> > such scenario can easily happen if the client is second to open the
> > device.
>
> As soon as you open a device you see key presses. If you see a release
> without a press, the press must have happened before you opened.
> So if you know when you opened and when a key is released, you'll
> have a lower limit on how long the key must have been held down.
>
Yes. I still do not see the usefulness of this data.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists