[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CAB52AD.60502@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 09:30:37 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, hpa@...or.com,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, ryan@...osecc.com,
tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/cpu] x86, cpu: Fix X86_FEATURE_NOPL
On 10/5/2010 2:47 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> tag it for -stable too?
>
What is the flaw that justifies it for stable, or even .36? It seems
relatively harmless, with at most a very minor performance issue, unless
I'm missing something?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists