[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101005165159.GQ19804@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 17:51:59 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Evgeny Kuznetsov <EXT-Eugeny.Kuznetsov@...ia.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk, hsweeten@...ionengravers.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] initramfs: strcpy destination string overflow
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:55:01AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I think this is wrong.
>
> If the name is too long to fit in the hash table, we should not create
> a new hash entry at all, because we'd be returning the wrong
> (truncated) name when we find it next time.
>
> So it would be much better to just do
>
> if (strlen(name) >= sizeof(q->name))
> return NULL;
>
> in find_link(), because as far as I can tell, the hard-linking is
> always just an optimization.
>
> Comments? Peter?
Take a look at struct hash definition. That sizeof is PATH_MAX and
do_header() will reject an entry with name longer than that. IOW,
the whole thing is a non-issue; we can add
if (strlen(name) >= PATH_MAX)
BUG();
if we really care, but that's it.
As a side note, it looks like we need a fat warning about blind "improvements"
of that kind in CodingStyle; cargo-cult replacements like that can easily
hide real bugs... ;-/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists