[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101006002944.4545cf32@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 00:29:44 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: stable@...nel.org
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"Cahill, Ben M" <ben.m.cahill@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iwl3945: queue the right work if the scan needs to be
aborted
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:43:58 +0200
Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > However, I do not think we should go with that to -stable (below
> > > 2.6.36). IIRC warnings showed up in current 2.6.36-rc, because of
> > > some other changes in the code.
> > >
> > > Stanislaw
Hello stable,
scrap this. I handed out a brown paper bag bug fix and if that doesn't
get into 2.6.36, it probably should go into 2.6.36.y. But let's see...
Regards,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists