[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101005225223.GC23315@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:52:24 -0700
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Igor Grinberg <grinberg@...pulab.co.il>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, vapier@...too.org,
khilman@...prootsystems.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
pavel@....cz, linux-input@...r.kernel.org, eric.y.miao@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Input: Make ADS7846 independent on regulator
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 12:09:39AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This wrapper function will accept non-existing regulators and
> not treat them as errors. Consumers will have to NULL-check their
> regulators.
No, this is actively unhelpful. If consumers can null check their
regulators then they can just as well do an IS_ERR() check and if we
just eat null pointers like this then the API doesn't degrade gracefully
when it can't implement things - for example, your regulator_set_voltage()
will report success when it fails to set a voltage which is going to
upset any consumer that thinks it did actually change the current
voltage.
The existing dummy regulator support already does all this in a manner
which is much less invasive for the core.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists