[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CAABC0E.3030700@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 07:47:58 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the lost-spurious-irq tree with the
tip tree
Hello, Stephen.
On 10/05/2010 05:13 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Tejun,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the lost-spurious-irq tree got a conflict in
> kernel/irq/spurious.c between commits
> 6b8ff3120c758340505dddf08ad685ebb841d5d5 ("genirq: Convert core code to
> irq_data") and bd151412263a67b5321e9dd1d5b4bf6d96fdebf3 ("genirq: Provide
> config option to disable deprecated code") from the tip tree and commits
> 32b5d378f49485f3ae172eb0ac2bfc4ebbbdb060 ("irq: cleanup irqfixup") and
> 80f97e2b33c3e66c11b10abd2890506a3abeb320 ("irq: make spurious poll timer
> per desc") from the lost-spurious-irq tree.
>
> I think I fixed it all up (see below). I can carry this fix (or a better
> one) as necessary.
Can you please drop lost-spurious-irq for now? It needs to be
reimplemented. I'll send a merge request again when it's ready.
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists