[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101005070123.GF12267@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:01:23 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the lost-spurious-irq tree with the
tip tree
* Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Not sure what I can do beyond making sure that all relevant people are
> informed about what trees are being merged. [...]
Fortunately there's a really simple solution: wait for an explicit reply
from a maintainer before adding a new-feature tree. (Solicite again via
a To: email if the Cc: went unanswered by the maintainers.)
Could you please start using that method for all subsystems i
co-maintain?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists