[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1286379974.6661.0.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:46:14 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, hpa@...or.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
vgoyal@...hat.com, sam@...nborg.org, tony@...eyournoodle.com,
ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
2nddept-manager@....hitachi.co.jp
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] jump label: fix module __init section race
On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 11:41 -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 09:00:50AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 17:58 +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> > > > +static void remove_module_init(struct module *mod)
> > >
> > > Hi Jason,
> > >
> > > Just a comment, I prefer remove_jump_label_module_init() than this name,
> > > because remove_module_init is too general.
> >
> > This is probably not too big of a deal since it is static, but the name
> > change may make it easier for etags and ctags users.
> >
> > Jason, are you OK if I pull in this patch and make the change myself?
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
>
> fine with me. I had a more specific function name and then shortened it
> because it seemed too long, either way is fine with me.
>
Maybe call it jl_remove_module_init()? For static functions, I usually
use abbreviations. As long as it isn't too confusing.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists