lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:20:15 -0500
From:	Bill Gatliff <bgat@...lgatliff.com>
To:	Arun Murthy <arun.murthy@...ricsson.com>
Cc:	lars@...afoo.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, kernel@...gutronix.de,
	philipp.zabel@...il.com, robert.jarzmik@...e.fr,
	marek.vasut@...il.com, eric.y.miao@...il.com, rpurdie@...ys.net,
	sameo@...ux.intel.com, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com, khilman@...prootsystems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 0/7] PWM core driver for pwm based led and backlight driver

Arun:

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:59 AM, Arun Murthy <arun.murthy@...ricsson.com> wrote:
> PWM core driver for pwm based led and backlight driver.

With all due respect, it looks like you have reinvented portions of my
RFC for a comprehensive PWM API that has been floating around on
linux-embedded for over a year--- with an update coming in the last
two weeks or so.  Why?

To make matters worse, when I posted my original code I was told to
move the whole discussion to linux-embedded, because as a
cross-platform API proposal that's where it belongs.  I encourage you
do likewise.

I have a terse email style, so I just want to be clear that I'm not
mad or anything.  Honest!  I'm just disappointed that you've invested
so much hard work in traveling down the same path I came over a year
ago.  Bummer for everyone.

Can we not combine our efforts?  I haven't reviewed all of your
patches yet, but you are clearly ahead of me in specific ARM platform
support.  On the other hand, I think my code is more refined in many
other areas.  I also have Blackfin, PowerPC, and Cirrus (ARM) support,
though some of the code is from contributors who are holding it until
I proffer my final code.


What do you think?  Just let me know privately by email, or over on
linux-embedded.


Thanks!


b.g.
-- 
Bill Gatliff
bgat@...lgatliff.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ