[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4CACB257.7060705@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2010 10:31:03 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, "jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] acpi: use indirect call to register gsi in different
modes
On 10/06/2010 10:00 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Peter,
> I sent this patch a while back as part of the "PV on HVM: receive
> interrupts as xen events" series (that it is based upon Konrad's
> pcifront series, he sent another version to the list yesterday).
>
> Do you think that this is a reasonble approach?
>
> If you want to give a look at the whole series you can find it here:
>
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/8/30/170
>
> everything else is Xen specific stuff.
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
On the surface it seems reasonable.
Thomas Gleixner has been working on greatly revamping a bunch of the x86
interrupt code, and this might interact with his stuff, so it would be
good if he could comment on it.
[tglx: what they're apparently working on is to redirect APIC interrupts
to Xen event channels so they don't have to interact with the simulated
memory-mapped APIC. It's "paravirtualization light".]
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists