[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101006193245.698957cc@schatten.dmk.lab>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 19:32:45 +0200
From: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
To: "Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com>
Cc: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
"linville@...driver.com" <linville@...driver.com>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
"ilw@...ux.intel.com" <ilw@...ux.intel.com>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"Cahill, Ben M" <ben.m.cahill@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-2.6 or stable] iwlwifi: return error when fail
to start scanning
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 09:12:58 -0700
"Guy, Wey-Yi" <wey-yi.w.guy@...el.com> wrote:
> Hi Gruszka,
>
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 09:04 -0700, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote:
> > This is stable friendly backport of wireless-testing commit
> > 3eecce527c7434dfd16517ce08b49632c8a26717 "iwlwifi: unify scan start
> > checks". Wireless-testing version include also a lot of cleanups.
> >
> > On error case in {iwl3945,iwlagn}_request_scan we queue abort_scan work,
> > which in a fact do nothing, so we never complete the scan. Thats gives
> > "WARNING: at net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work" and stopped
> > network connection until reload iwlwifi modules. Return of -EIO, and
> > stopping queuing any work is a fix.
> >
> > Note there are still many cases when we can get:
> >
> > WARNING: at net/wireless/core.c:614 wdev_cleanup_work
> > WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:266 ieee80211_scan_completed
> > WARNING: at net/mac80211/scan.c:269 ieee80211_scan_complete
> >
> > which are not fixed. Unfortunately does not exist single, small fix
> > for that problems, and we probably will see some more bug reports
> > with scan warnings. As solution we rewrite iwl-scan.c code to avoid
> > all possible race conditions. That quite big patch set is queued
> > for 2.6.37 .
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > Patch is intended for wireless-2.6, or in case when it does not
> > make 2.6.36 release, for -stable 2.6.36.y
> >
>
> Is this the replacement for Mickler's patch?
>
> Thanks
> Wey
>
This is on top of current mainline, as far as I see. (And it replaces
the patch I sent few hours ago)
Regards,
Flo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists