[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikYRSQw-+Tcj4VS1qxi=OaeF9C5hjAMWVu+0M=v@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:22:13 -0700
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@...ux.intel.com>,
Luis Rodriguez <Luis.Rodriguez@...eros.com>,
linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Deepak Dhamdhere <Deepak.Dhamdhere@...eros.com>,
Sree Durbha <Sree.Durbha@...eros.com>
Subject: Re: RFC: btusb firmware load help
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 10:39 -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>
>> > With sflash based AR3011 hardware, when we connect the device to USB
>> > port it gets detected as a Bluetooth device because of firmware in
>> > Flash (VID=0x0CF3, PID=0x3002). This triggers the Bluetooth sub
>> > system driver (btusb.ko) directly in the host instead of ath3k
>> > DFU driver. Therefore, there is no firmware downloaded in to the
>> > RAM to bring up Bluetooth at this point. This is the problem
>> > we're trying to "fix".
>
> So the easiest fix for this would be to
> a) ignore 0x0cf3,0x3002 in btusb
> b) add it to ath3k firmware loading
> c) change the ath3k firmware to load with 0x0cf3,0x3003 (or whatever
> else you want, as long as it's not 0x3000 and not 0x3002)
>
> Then the ignore in btusb won't affect ath3k after that new firmware was
> loaded.
Good idea, I forgot about possible firmware changes :) Lets see if our
team can do that. Thanks for all the feedback.
Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists