[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101006184353.GA30673@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2010 20:43:53 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] one writeback regression fix for .36
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 07:31:24PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Eh... I'm no fonder of that than you are (and strcmp is fucking stupid),
> but... that thing is really sb_is_blkdev_sb() trying to make a comeback
> in fs/fs-writeback.c. IOW, it's sick, but not for the reasons you are
> mentioning; strcmp() use is trivially removable.
The alternative basically is exporting bd_type so that it can be used
here and comparing ->s_type. The real problem is that right now the
internal block device filesystem is the only one having more than one
backing device per filesystem. I have patches to generalize that, which
is something we'll need for writeback performance on large filesystem
sooner or later. I was planning to get this ready for 2.6.37, but if
you prefer no big chance in this area I can calm down and move other
things up on my TODO list.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists